A home for those who love almost everything about The Ticket (1310 AM, 96.7 FM, Dallas-Fort Worth), and who would like to discuss -- respectfully and fondly -- their thoughts on how (and whether) to eliminate the "almost."
Showing posts with label Streaming Audio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Streaming Audio. Show all posts
Monday, April 24, 2017
i♥, Likely RIP
iHeartRadio is in serious trouble.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/iheartradio-parent-warns-it-may-not-survive-another-year-2017-04-21-121035436
Unlike some recent speculations by visitors to this site on Cumulus's looming demise, this looks like the real thing.
It seems unlikely this would mean the disappearance of the iHeart streams and other services. A Chapter 11 bankruptcy, if it happens, means restructuring, selling off assets, and the like -- those assets don't just disappear.
I will leave to Confessors who do more streaming than I do (all of them) to comment on whether it matters to them if the iHeartRadio app for Ticket monitoring lives or dies.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
July 17, 2012
7:24 a.m.: Stream down.
Ticket computers down, at least in the period prior to The Musers' 5:30 start. At 5:35, Junior referred to it as "sabotage." A minute or two ago, they made reference to computers being down again.
Did yesterday's Muser invasion over Gordon's promo recording make yesterday's Top 10?
Now there's an echo from time to time. Faint, but very audible in the replay of the Fake Jason Kidd interview.
Speaking of which: Pretty savage Fake Jason Kidd, essentially accusing him of illiteracy.
Ticket computers down, at least in the period prior to The Musers' 5:30 start. At 5:35, Junior referred to it as "sabotage." A minute or two ago, they made reference to computers being down again.
Did yesterday's Muser invasion over Gordon's promo recording make yesterday's Top 10?
Now there's an echo from time to time. Faint, but very audible in the replay of the Fake Jason Kidd interview.
Speaking of which: Pretty savage Fake Jason Kidd, essentially accusing him of illiteracy.
Friday, June 1, 2012
June 1, 2012
8:12 a.m. -- Thanks to all Confessors for not ragging me for getting the year wrong in the last two posts.
8:14 a.m. -- Listening to The Hardline yesterday,
and how sad and defeated Mike sounded, I did wonder, along with a commentor from late yesterday, whether he might be thinking about hanging it up. He signed a new contract late last year, but of all the hosts, he is probably the most financially able to quit The Ticket. He lives pretty frugally, he probably banked a fairish amount from the original sale of The Ticket way back when, and he has probably cashed in pretty well on his last several contracts, if not the earlier ones.
In addition, the symbolic effect of his departure would be enormous
. It is the one act I can think of, other than a sponsor boycott (which ain't gonna happen as long as the ratings remain strong and no host slanders an influential special interest group), that might actually shake up Cumulus management. More on this at a later date.
8:35 a.m. -- What's the latest on the Dr. Sanjay Gupta infestation?
8:35 a.m. -- While we're ragging on behind-the-scenes stuff, what accounts for the continuing confusion on some of the live spots? (Actually, it's entertaining, I'm not sure I want the confusion to stop, but if I were a paying sponsor I might be concerned.) The latest victim was this morning's "Belle Vida" (sp?? I have no idea what George and Gordon were trying to say; on the Philco, I first heard it as "Velveeta") spot.
8:40 a.m. -- Are things as bad at The Ticket as we are making out? They are pretty bad, we know this from the high-risk on-air and Twitter stuff that has gone out lately, but let's be fair: The station is broadcasting. The shows are still better than the competition.
But here's a question I have been pondering: Is this site making it worse, providing, for better or worse, a place for the P1 to gather and gripe? I guess there's the Radio-Info board and grubesismyleader, so maybe not. And I guess there's a public-service aspect with information swapping on stream issues.
So I have decided not to be too hard on myself.
By the way -- what's the latest on the stream?
8:50 a.m. -- Had an awful thought. What if DP and AP and The UnTicket's vast staff can't solve the recording problem caused by IHeart?
8:14 a.m. -- Listening to The Hardline yesterday,
and how sad and defeated Mike sounded, I did wonder, along with a commentor from late yesterday, whether he might be thinking about hanging it up. He signed a new contract late last year, but of all the hosts, he is probably the most financially able to quit The Ticket. He lives pretty frugally, he probably banked a fairish amount from the original sale of The Ticket way back when, and he has probably cashed in pretty well on his last several contracts, if not the earlier ones.
In addition, the symbolic effect of his departure would be enormous
. It is the one act I can think of, other than a sponsor boycott (which ain't gonna happen as long as the ratings remain strong and no host slanders an influential special interest group), that might actually shake up Cumulus management. More on this at a later date.
8:35 a.m. -- What's the latest on the Dr. Sanjay Gupta infestation?
8:35 a.m. -- While we're ragging on behind-the-scenes stuff, what accounts for the continuing confusion on some of the live spots? (Actually, it's entertaining, I'm not sure I want the confusion to stop, but if I were a paying sponsor I might be concerned.) The latest victim was this morning's "Belle Vida" (sp?? I have no idea what George and Gordon were trying to say; on the Philco, I first heard it as "Velveeta") spot.
8:40 a.m. -- Are things as bad at The Ticket as we are making out? They are pretty bad, we know this from the high-risk on-air and Twitter stuff that has gone out lately, but let's be fair: The station is broadcasting. The shows are still better than the competition.
But here's a question I have been pondering: Is this site making it worse, providing, for better or worse, a place for the P1 to gather and gripe? I guess there's the Radio-Info board and grubesismyleader, so maybe not. And I guess there's a public-service aspect with information swapping on stream issues.
So I have decided not to be too hard on myself.
By the way -- what's the latest on the stream?
8:50 a.m. -- Had an awful thought. What if DP and AP and The UnTicket's vast staff can't solve the recording problem caused by IHeart?
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
OPEN THREAD: Ticket-Listening Tech & Talk
I've noted an uptick in the number of questions commenters have on how to listen to The Ticket other than via the Philco.
To start this off, I'd like to collect all of the various ways it is possible to listen to The Ticket other than through a conventional radio. There is, of course, the online stream accessible on the website.
There. I've exhausted my knowledge of the topic.
I'd like to give listeners a list of as many other ways of listening to The Ticket -- mobile and non -- as possible. Can some of you get us started with a catalogue of online sites and programs? While knowledgeable listeners are doing that, you are also free to throw out questions on problems you're having, and someone out there will probably have encountered it and solved it.
If you're savvy, please contribute to (1) listing the programs and sites available for listening (podcasts, too), with any preferences you may have; (2) questions and problems; and (3) solutions. If this is too huge a topic we'll break it down in future episodes.
Don't know why I didn't think of this before. Might actually do Confessors some good for a change. Thanks in advance for your contribution, be it information, problem, or solution.
Ranjit, Chad, if you're out there, please check in.
To start this off, I'd like to collect all of the various ways it is possible to listen to The Ticket other than through a conventional radio. There is, of course, the online stream accessible on the website.
There. I've exhausted my knowledge of the topic.
I'd like to give listeners a list of as many other ways of listening to The Ticket -- mobile and non -- as possible. Can some of you get us started with a catalogue of online sites and programs? While knowledgeable listeners are doing that, you are also free to throw out questions on problems you're having, and someone out there will probably have encountered it and solved it.
If you're savvy, please contribute to (1) listing the programs and sites available for listening (podcasts, too), with any preferences you may have; (2) questions and problems; and (3) solutions. If this is too huge a topic we'll break it down in future episodes.
Don't know why I didn't think of this before. Might actually do Confessors some good for a change. Thanks in advance for your contribution, be it information, problem, or solution.
Ranjit, Chad, if you're out there, please check in.
* * *
Follow Your Plainsman on Twitter: @Plainsman1310
Email Your Plainsman: ThePlainsman1310@gmail.com
Thursday, September 2, 2010
The Star v. The Suit
If you didn't hear the spat between Craig "Junior" Miller and Rich "The Ticket Man of Mystery" Phillips, go over to The "Magnificent" UnTicket (or is it unTicket?) and check it out.
http://www.theunticket.com/rich-phillips-vs-the-musers/
Back? Good.
Apparently The Ticket's Internet feed was unwell. That feed is important. I am able to tell where My Ticket Confession's readers come from, and it is amazing how many of them do not come from The Ticket's tiny coverage area. (Interestingly, almost all of my non-DFW readers come from east of the Mississippi.) These folks are either listening online, or visit the unTicket on a regular basis. A lot of locals do, too. I click on that green LISTEN LIVE link frequently myself.
Anyway, Rich was dealing with this crisis, if it was a crisis, during on-air time. It is difficult to tell what the problem was, because apparently everyone agreed that he was fixing something having to do with the Saturday morning broadcast, which is at odds with what Junior was suggesting at the outset, and it similarly at odds with what I've heard from some online listeners, who advise Your Plainsman that there were indeed problems that morning. It is hard to tell exactly what Rich was doing, or where he was doing it, but it apparently rankled Junior and they had a bit of a set-to about it. Junior found the timing inappropriate; Rich's position was that he was so busy that he had to get things done when he could. I won't give you a blow-by-blow -- you really need to check it out.
It may not surprise you that I have a number of TROs (Tepid Radio Opinions) about it, some of which are actually pertinent to the segment:
(1) It is difficult to discern a right and wrong here. On the one hand, Junior and the on-air guys are doing their morning high-wire act, which is harder than it probably seems to the casual listener. Distractions are undoubtedly unwelcome. On the other hand, as noted, that Internet feed is important to the P1 Nation (and I do mean Nation), as noted. Maybe Rich, as the Cumulus executive present, felt it was his duty to set things right and he decided in his management discretion that this needed to be tended to without delay. Would Cat have dealt with it if he hadn't been on vacation (if he still is)? I don't know, but you have to cut Rich some slack for taking responsibility for a technical issue that he otherwise might not have had to deal with. So I can see both sides here. However, I did take Dan McDowell to task for jabbing Tom and others on the air, and when I heard this contretemps, I thought perhaps Junior's displeasure might have been saved for a more private moment. Slight -- very slight -- advantage, Rich. But I concede that if one were in the studio and witnessing what was actually taking place Junior's peevishness might have been justified and perhaps he rightfully felt that the situation needed to be addressed right then. So -- toss-up, uninformed TRO slightly tipping to Rich.
(2) This is another example of the combustible relationship between celebrated and well-paid on-air guys and the somewhat more peripheral players, rendered more combustible here because Rich isn't all that peripheral. He's an assistant program director, sometime host (see below), and hosts the much-teased "Race Week" (ditto). I sense that Rich is actually pretty well-respected up and down the broadcast day, including The Musers. (Gordon is an interesting semi-exception, but that needs a separate post. Dan -- dunno.)
(3) The comments to the unTicket post were fascinating. Both Junior and Rich took it in the shorts, but I like them both quite a bit.
A couple of people judge Junior to be the weak link in The Musers, but I do not. He works much harder than George at show prep, does a first-rate blog, and offers very thoughtful HSOs. He's not the encyclopedia that Bob or Norm is, but he strikes me as extremely perceptive and very fair. When he's gotten some Big Opinion wrong, he will call attention to his earlier judgment and correct it.
(4) Rich is also criticized in those comments, but (contrary to my early dislike of Rich) I have come to think he is a real asset to The Ticket. The Tickers are masterpieces of audio economy. And "Race Week" -- look out. Mike teases about syndicating it, and the hosts talk about it as though it is a chore to listen to, but think about it -- it's a terrific candidate for syndication. Lots and lots of NASCAR fans out there, and not a whole lot of dedicated sports radio coveratge. I don't care anything about NASCAR, but when I'm doing chores on the weekend and it comes on, I listen. The day might well come when Rich is a nationally-known broadcaster. He's massively knowledgeable and there is a toughness to his reportage and delivery that fits perfectly with the sport and its fans. Oh, almost forgot: Terrific PBP guy for the SMU Mustangs, delivers a very exciting and interesting call dotted with his piquant observations. Rich might have to update his look a little for TV, lose a pound or 30, but why not? If I had to guess who might be the first breakout national talent on The Ticket, it would be Rich Phillips. (Unless Cumulus syndicates The Musers, then maybe Gordon.)
(PS: Who out there can tell me why he is referred to as Dick Hicks?)
(5) Having said that, Rich remains The Ticket Man of Mystery. Cumulus has identified him as a guy to whom to give some responsibility, and a show, and showgram fill-in. Yet his presence on drive-time isn't technically superior to that of Ty WahKAH. I haven't quite figured it out, but I sense just the slightest wariness in the hosts about his presence hovering at the border of the broadcasts. He does contribute usefully when he switches on his mic during segments, and overall, as I say, I don't get a strong vibe of antagonism. I can't imagine Gordon would have said "someone doesn't like his job" if Rich's management role were really a big problem.
Actually, since it was Gordon, I can imagine it.
(6) But Rich is also very prickly. When he gets teased, he sometimes strikes back with some heat. I'm not entirely sure that isn't what happened here. Junior started off with a joke, characterizing the work being done as similar to running a test pattern over Brian Williams. Rich could have shrugged that off, but he responded sharply, and Junior shot back even more sharply, suggesting rather pointedly that the time was not appropriate.
(7) George mostly kept out of it.
(8) We (all right, I) tend to focus on what this means about Rich, but I think it means something about Junior. Rich repeatedly referred to Junior as "interim program director" in a way that suggested that insiders would know exactly what he was talking about. That got everyone's attention. I admire Junior tremendously, but I must admit -- I have sometimes wondered if perhaps his somewhat detached attitude is interpreted by his colleagues as a Marconi-clutching air of superiority?
(9) But what the P1 Nation really wants to know is -- when Rich says "We're done, OK? It's over!" -- with considerable emphasis -- does he mean (1) "I have completed this controversial but regrettably necessary task, gentlemen, so we may now conclude this civilized little chinwag" or does he mean (2) "Put a fracking cork in it, Miller, your APD has had enough of your snotty insinuations"? Some of the commenters over at The unTicket thought he meant (1), but I'm not entirely sure. Just before the clip ends, you hear Gordon chortling in a very "wow-this-is-pretty-inside-stuff-to-be-going-out-over-the-air" way, and saying "My . . . " just before the clip ends. I'm guessing that the implied conclusion to that phrase is "fracking Gawd," or a sentiment to that effect. I'd say there's an even chance or better that Rich -- who reported during the fracas that he'd worked 11 hours every day that week, suggesting that he was tending to management items in Jeff C's absence -- was flexing a little supervisory muscle there. Whatever he meant, that was the end of it. Junior fell silent.
(10) If Junior hadn't said anything, would anyone have noticed anything at all unusual about the broadcast? Was there, in fact, a test-pattern-over-Brian-Williams radio analogue that was audible to listeners? I didn't hear it.
(11) Is it possible -- I mean, is it within the power of the mind of man to conceive -- that we're (I'm) mining too much meaning out of a minute of Ticket audio?
Nah.
I have a great idea for fight night next year.
Thank You for Shopping at My Ticket Confession.
http://www.theunticket.com/rich-phillips-vs-the-musers/
Back? Good.
Apparently The Ticket's Internet feed was unwell. That feed is important. I am able to tell where My Ticket Confession's readers come from, and it is amazing how many of them do not come from The Ticket's tiny coverage area. (Interestingly, almost all of my non-DFW readers come from east of the Mississippi.) These folks are either listening online, or visit the unTicket on a regular basis. A lot of locals do, too. I click on that green LISTEN LIVE link frequently myself.
Anyway, Rich was dealing with this crisis, if it was a crisis, during on-air time. It is difficult to tell what the problem was, because apparently everyone agreed that he was fixing something having to do with the Saturday morning broadcast, which is at odds with what Junior was suggesting at the outset, and it similarly at odds with what I've heard from some online listeners, who advise Your Plainsman that there were indeed problems that morning. It is hard to tell exactly what Rich was doing, or where he was doing it, but it apparently rankled Junior and they had a bit of a set-to about it. Junior found the timing inappropriate; Rich's position was that he was so busy that he had to get things done when he could. I won't give you a blow-by-blow -- you really need to check it out.
It may not surprise you that I have a number of TROs (Tepid Radio Opinions) about it, some of which are actually pertinent to the segment:
(1) It is difficult to discern a right and wrong here. On the one hand, Junior and the on-air guys are doing their morning high-wire act, which is harder than it probably seems to the casual listener. Distractions are undoubtedly unwelcome. On the other hand, as noted, that Internet feed is important to the P1 Nation (and I do mean Nation), as noted. Maybe Rich, as the Cumulus executive present, felt it was his duty to set things right and he decided in his management discretion that this needed to be tended to without delay. Would Cat have dealt with it if he hadn't been on vacation (if he still is)? I don't know, but you have to cut Rich some slack for taking responsibility for a technical issue that he otherwise might not have had to deal with. So I can see both sides here. However, I did take Dan McDowell to task for jabbing Tom and others on the air, and when I heard this contretemps, I thought perhaps Junior's displeasure might have been saved for a more private moment. Slight -- very slight -- advantage, Rich. But I concede that if one were in the studio and witnessing what was actually taking place Junior's peevishness might have been justified and perhaps he rightfully felt that the situation needed to be addressed right then. So -- toss-up, uninformed TRO slightly tipping to Rich.
(2) This is another example of the combustible relationship between celebrated and well-paid on-air guys and the somewhat more peripheral players, rendered more combustible here because Rich isn't all that peripheral. He's an assistant program director, sometime host (see below), and hosts the much-teased "Race Week" (ditto). I sense that Rich is actually pretty well-respected up and down the broadcast day, including The Musers. (Gordon is an interesting semi-exception, but that needs a separate post. Dan -- dunno.)
(3) The comments to the unTicket post were fascinating. Both Junior and Rich took it in the shorts, but I like them both quite a bit.
A couple of people judge Junior to be the weak link in The Musers, but I do not. He works much harder than George at show prep, does a first-rate blog, and offers very thoughtful HSOs. He's not the encyclopedia that Bob or Norm is, but he strikes me as extremely perceptive and very fair. When he's gotten some Big Opinion wrong, he will call attention to his earlier judgment and correct it.
Alexis Smith, KTCK Trafic Twist
So it's irrelevant. You got a problem with it?
(4) Rich is also criticized in those comments, but (contrary to my early dislike of Rich) I have come to think he is a real asset to The Ticket. The Tickers are masterpieces of audio economy. And "Race Week" -- look out. Mike teases about syndicating it, and the hosts talk about it as though it is a chore to listen to, but think about it -- it's a terrific candidate for syndication. Lots and lots of NASCAR fans out there, and not a whole lot of dedicated sports radio coveratge. I don't care anything about NASCAR, but when I'm doing chores on the weekend and it comes on, I listen. The day might well come when Rich is a nationally-known broadcaster. He's massively knowledgeable and there is a toughness to his reportage and delivery that fits perfectly with the sport and its fans. Oh, almost forgot: Terrific PBP guy for the SMU Mustangs, delivers a very exciting and interesting call dotted with his piquant observations. Rich might have to update his look a little for TV, lose a pound or 30, but why not? If I had to guess who might be the first breakout national talent on The Ticket, it would be Rich Phillips. (Unless Cumulus syndicates The Musers, then maybe Gordon.)
(PS: Who out there can tell me why he is referred to as Dick Hicks?)
(5) Having said that, Rich remains The Ticket Man of Mystery. Cumulus has identified him as a guy to whom to give some responsibility, and a show, and showgram fill-in. Yet his presence on drive-time isn't technically superior to that of Ty WahKAH. I haven't quite figured it out, but I sense just the slightest wariness in the hosts about his presence hovering at the border of the broadcasts. He does contribute usefully when he switches on his mic during segments, and overall, as I say, I don't get a strong vibe of antagonism. I can't imagine Gordon would have said "someone doesn't like his job" if Rich's management role were really a big problem.
Actually, since it was Gordon, I can imagine it.
(6) But Rich is also very prickly. When he gets teased, he sometimes strikes back with some heat. I'm not entirely sure that isn't what happened here. Junior started off with a joke, characterizing the work being done as similar to running a test pattern over Brian Williams. Rich could have shrugged that off, but he responded sharply, and Junior shot back even more sharply, suggesting rather pointedly that the time was not appropriate.
Brian Williams (top); Test Pattern (bottom)
(7) George mostly kept out of it.
(8) We (all right, I) tend to focus on what this means about Rich, but I think it means something about Junior. Rich repeatedly referred to Junior as "interim program director" in a way that suggested that insiders would know exactly what he was talking about. That got everyone's attention. I admire Junior tremendously, but I must admit -- I have sometimes wondered if perhaps his somewhat detached attitude is interpreted by his colleagues as a Marconi-clutching air of superiority?
(9) But what the P1 Nation really wants to know is -- when Rich says "We're done, OK? It's over!" -- with considerable emphasis -- does he mean (1) "I have completed this controversial but regrettably necessary task, gentlemen, so we may now conclude this civilized little chinwag" or does he mean (2) "Put a fracking cork in it, Miller, your APD has had enough of your snotty insinuations"? Some of the commenters over at The unTicket thought he meant (1), but I'm not entirely sure. Just before the clip ends, you hear Gordon chortling in a very "wow-this-is-pretty-inside-stuff-to-be-going-out-over-the-air" way, and saying "My . . . " just before the clip ends. I'm guessing that the implied conclusion to that phrase is "fracking Gawd," or a sentiment to that effect. I'd say there's an even chance or better that Rich -- who reported during the fracas that he'd worked 11 hours every day that week, suggesting that he was tending to management items in Jeff C's absence -- was flexing a little supervisory muscle there. Whatever he meant, that was the end of it. Junior fell silent.
(10) If Junior hadn't said anything, would anyone have noticed anything at all unusual about the broadcast? Was there, in fact, a test-pattern-over-Brian-Williams radio analogue that was audible to listeners? I didn't hear it.
(11) Is it possible -- I mean, is it within the power of the mind of man to conceive -- that we're (I'm) mining too much meaning out of a minute of Ticket audio?
Nah.
I have a great idea for fight night next year.
Thank You for Shopping at My Ticket Confession.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)