A home for those who love almost everything about The Ticket (1310 AM, 96.7 FM, Dallas-Fort Worth), and who would like to discuss -- respectfully and fondly -- their thoughts on how (and whether) to eliminate the "almost."
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
I Agree with KoKo
Robin Williams's (RIP, and with respect) films are overrated.
Also: Re: Junior's enthusiasm for the Anthony Hamilton National Anthem: I didn't have a problem with it from a "respect" point of view, and it was a little pretty, but I did think it was very obvious that Mr. Hamilton has absolutely zero range, and there was no other way he could possibly have sung it. No shame in that -- it's a real hard song for good singers to sing, so he can hardly be blamed for arranging it a version that fit his five-note range.
Also: According to the Musers, Corby has offered photographic evidence which, according to Corby, provides us with assurances that Kyler Murray is at least five-eleven. I'm surprised that he has not stated: "To be perfectly honest with you, I guaran-damn-tee you that Kyler Murray is the tallest person ever born, and it's not even close."
Well, this is a pretty cheap post. Not that it's your problem, but Your Plainsman has been underwater with personal and professional obligations since before Thanksgiving..
I am marinating one of my recently-rare STDs (Scorching Ticket Disquisitions), but it's not quite ready to loose on the Confessor.
In the meantime, leave an interesting, but nice, comment.
Many thanks.
Tuesday, February 5, 2019
The True Meaning of Ticketstock
A distaff Confessor kindly gives me permission to post this snap of her and a tres natty George "The Broadcaster Formerly Known as The Commander" Dunham from Ticketstock.
Sorry, Martha, for some reason notification of your email didn't pop up on my phone, so I'm a few days late with this.
Anyone have anything else, please feel free to pass it along to:
ThePlainsman1310@gmail.com
Thanks again. Sounds like it was an epic gathering.
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
Change is Good
As we approach the 25th Anniversary of The Ticket and this year's TicketStock, I've been thinking of what I should put in this space to commemorate it.
I couldn't think of anything.
I don't have a lot of interest in Top Ticket Moments for some reason, astounding and entertaining as many of them have been.
I've been listening to The Ticket since 2004, the year I arrived in Dallas -- 15 years. The singular fact about The Ticket during that period -- and before -- is that it hasn't changed much. With a few changes, some of which occurred very early on, it's been the same hosts in the same time period for all those years. Amazing, and certainly a reason for its continued success.
But The Ticket has changed, sometimes in subtle, gradual ways. I was hoping to come up with three, but I've settled on two:
(1) The Ascendance of The Musers and Craig "Junior" Miller. The shows have never been ranked, but in my early years of listening I would have said, if asked, that The Hardline was the quintessential Ticket show and certainly the one most closely identified with the station.
I think that has changed not because The Hardline has declined -- I don't think it has, contrary to the views of some Confessors -- but because The Musers have continued to grow and improve. "The Musers" is now the most prominent and celebrated show on the station and I would say that even if the ratings didn't bear me out.
And I think the rise of The Musers is because of the rise of Junior Miller, the Fred Astaire of The Ticket. When I began listening, George Dunham was "The Commander." You don't hear that much any more. Instead, Craig Miller is the Judge and Lord High Executioner for station controversies, and the creator of "tiers" to rank the relative prominence of persons appearing on the station. He is the most prominent host on The Ticket, eclipsing Mike Rhyner and even his podnuh George Dunham.
(George -- love the guy, but there came a period some years back where his interest level clearly waned. I don't know if it was because he was building a house or building a band, but there were some segments where he simply wasn't ready to broadcast, and you could hear Junior's irritation. Not really a knock on George -- he's still great -- but not the station leader he once appeared to be. (And his occasional unpreparedness seems to have abated in recent years.))
(2) The Growing Prominence and Quality of the Junior Varsity. I credit Jeff Catlin for hiring and showcasing down-tier talent. Yes, there have been some flameouts, some misses, some jerks, and some who just flat failed to launch, but by and large the non-daily-host on-air people are very good and getting better and better. There's not enough room in the broadcast day to give some of them the prominence they deserve. Too bad you can't sell enough advertising off hours to give some of these guys (and Julie) their own shows other than on weekends. (Or can you -- while leveraging the broadcast day on the Ticket Top Ten is genius, could you do better with a live Work-in-Progress from 7-10 nightly?)
I hesitate to name names for fear of leaving out some top-quality folks, but in no particular order, there's Justin Montemayor, Mike Sirois (honorable mention -- Cash), Jake Kemp, Sean Bass, Ty Walker, Julie Dobbs, David Mino. (I don't count Danny Balis as JV, but he's kind of equivalent to Jake on BaD, so you could list him here too.) Dave Lane as a cameo JV. Hey, I'm sure I'm leaving out some real good up-and-comers, so help me out here in the comments.
(3) The Hardline? I said I was going to do two, but of course the show with the most wrenching change during my listening history has been The Hardline, with the separation of Greg "The Hammer" Williams a decade or so back. Of course that's a "change," but here I'm going to offer a view which I know will be at odds with those of some long-time listeners: I think The Hardline is in some ways a better show now than it was when HeeHoo was on it.
Yes, it is true that Mike's interest has declined and he doesn't pay a whole lot of attention sometimes.
Yes, it is true that Mike allows Corby and Danny to browbeat him when he should be putting them firmly in their respective places.
Yes, it is true that Corby is a mic hog.
Yes, it is true that the lack of show prep can verge on disrespect of the P1.
But for all that, I listen. And I laugh more at The Hardline than at any of the other shows. I've said it before: Corby Davidson is the Howard Cosell of The Ticket -- he'll irritate the living bejeebers out of you, but still you tune in and (usually) don't tune out. And I and other Confessors have observed how good he can be when he's away from the nurturing biosphere of the who-cares Hardline.
I was tired of Hammer's ignorant redneck act before he got the heave-ho, and his various issues were plainly affecting his broadcasting long before he crashed and burned. I'll punch out on Corby and Danny from time to time (Mike isn't present or flavorful enough to excite the punch-out finger much anymore, although he's still a mesmerizing broadcaster when he's engaged -- that is, when he's got a subject that really interests him, or with a co-host who engages him), but for me, The Hardline is great entertainment and better than it was 15 years ago.
* * *
I'm not going to make TicketStock this year, so send your photos of TicketChicks and other watchables to:
ThePlainsman1310@gmail.com
* * *
How has The Ticket changed for you?
Friday, January 18, 2019
Random Items
(1) The Hardline is not out of the mainstream on this, but I am: Season Two of "True Detective" was not terrible. I thought it was very good, if not as linear as Season One. Hard to follow, but I loved the atmospherics of sun-baked Los Angeles. Had kind of a Twin Peaks getsalt that I enjoyed.
(2) Ditto Season Three: It is being hugely overpraised by The Hardline (The Hardline? Overpraising something? Surely not) and most other observers. Again, I'm an outlier here. The writing is sharp, but it suffers terribly from the Breaking Bad Disease -- endless lingering takes of Ali looking anguished, a la Bryan Cranston. For having a two-hour premier, precious little happened except for shot after shot of said anguished Ali. Hey, did the True Detectives kill that ex-con in the trunk?
Two stars.
(3) Is that new Desperados ad the cheapest, cheapest-sounding, and overall worst commercial ever aired on The Ticket, with the possible exceptions of The Bulldog and those wall-removal guys with their ten-year warranty? (What -- the wall might reappear after 10 years? if the house falls down after ten years for lack of a supporting wall, no problem?) Wait, I forgot those mortifying Tight Ends Sports Bar and Grill girls. Good Jah, the mumbling, almost incomprehensible, unconvincing copy by some offspring of someone followed up with the goofy coda. Awful.
Is Desperados as good as the Ticket guys who get the free grub make it sound?
Which makes me wonder if there is some review of commercials for suitability for the air. Actually, I guess I don't wonder: There must not be any.
(4) Any of you out there voting for the top Ticket moment? I've heard so many of them so many times over the years I don't have much interest in it. I've assumed the Nolan Ryan Great Snow Monkey Battle will win, but dunno.
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Saturday, December 29, 2018
Not Such a Dry Dock
Without exception, I have enjoyed all of the Drydock combinations I've been able to hear -- Jake and Sean, Danny and Davey, the Siroisie wherever they would pop up. Probably forgetting some, and I didn't hear all of the Drydock shows. (See repeated comment below for an uncomplimentary review of one particular combo.)
There is a temptation to think -- whatever will we do when (pick one or more)
-- One or more Musers retires from the show?
-- Norm retires (OK, not so many thinking what they will do if)?
-- Bob goes off to hockey/full-time Troy servicing/TV/another station?
-- Dan does something?
-- Mike retires?
-- Corby does something?
-- Danny disappears into the world of local music promotion, hospitality industry, better-paying broadcast job elsewhere?
But based on what I heard over the past week or so, I think there will be plenty of talent, plenty of laughs, plenty of bits, plenty of scheduled segments, to keep The Ticket on top in any of these events.
I've had occasion to listen to sports radio in a couple of different cities over the past couple of months. Is it bad? Maybe not, if it's the only thing you're used to, and the local guys
are engaging enough that you develop a kind of radio romance over time. But if you're a casual tune-in for a few days -- yeah, it's bad.
But The Ticket -- it's a different bird. It's a different sound entirely, warm and intimate, informal and fun. It's a hackneyed sentiment at this point, but it bears repeating -- there's nothing like it. Three Marconis should be evidence enough.
Let's enjoy it while we can. Then we can enjoy it some more.
A very, very safe and happy New Year to all Confessors.
And a special New Year's holler to mo money, mo problems:
Monday, December 24, 2018
A Merry Non-Denominational Context-Dependent Christmas to All Confessors
My Ticket monitoring has returned to near-normal after a couple of months of difficulty in finding the time to get my ears listening. Hope to have something fun to chew on soon.
In the meantime, have a safe and happy Christmas, all Confessors around the world.
Monday, December 17, 2018
I Heard It on the Handoff
Danny Balis: "We're [the Orphanage, with Dave Lane] going to do something today that the Hardline hasn't done in probably fifteen years."
Mike Sirois: "Prepare?"
Loved it.
So we're not the only ones.
(Oh, yeah, the actual answer was: Take calls.)
Tuesday, December 11, 2018
On the Run with Dan and Mike
I caught a fair bit of the Dan McDowell-Mike Sirois midday presentation today in the car and thought it was pretty good.
I was going to write a compare-and-contrast thing about Dan and Bob, on the one hand, and Dan and Other People, on the other, but I'm in between commitments here and expected elsewhere soon.
Also, I'm uncertain what I think about that topic.
Maybe I'll come back to this later and jot down a few thoughts on the enigmatic chemical ingredient that is Dan McDowell.
Or maybe you guys can write it for me.
![]() |
| Dan and Mike, it's not important that you have hair; it's only important that I have hair. |
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
Your Destination for White Elephant Commentary
Please check in. Shaping up to be an entertaining day. The prewritten gags are always jewels.
I find it of interest that the two most senior hosts -- Norm and Mike -- got to keep their regular slots.
Fix: in.
Monday, December 3, 2018
There Is Nothing Like the Ticket
Or maybe there's nobody like Gordon Keith.
Or maybe there's nobody like Jason "Killer" Kellison.
But as I was marveling this morning at yet another one of Killer's Gordon-penned oral essays, this one on Christmas, the thought that came to me was that as brilliant as Gordon can be -- is -- and as perfect a foil as Killer has sacrificed his dignity and self-esteem to become, what's unreproduceable these bits is the combination of the two of them, and Junior's appreciative laughing-but-not-overlaughing, and Jeff Catlin keeping his hand lightly enough on the tiller to allow this kind of satire on some things that some listeners unquestionably believe are beyond kidding.
Gordon couldn't perform that essay himself. It would never work. The words wouldn't be funny coming out of his smart mouth. Jer -- no. Craig, George -- no. Fernando -- certainly not. Killer -- he ain't dumb, but his history of eager but not-entirely-smooth forays onto the air makes him the perfect interpreter of these bits, which I almost always find hilarious. Of course, nobody thinks Killer is dumb. I sure don't; Ticket management certainly doesn't. But in Killer, Gordon has found the perfect actor, and it's impossible to imagine any other program on The Ticket or the Fan or ESPN where that bit could even have been offered.
Which is why, among many other reasons, The Ticket is essential. It is the only home for certain kinds of programming, the for the peculiar genius that bubbles up out of the chemistry between this once-in-a-lifetime -- or maybe once-in-a-generation -- set of humans.
Ken Berry, RIP.
Thursday, November 22, 2018
I've Been Away
and not able to listen to The Ticket (even streaming) or post. Thanks for your patience.
Anyone got the WED lineup?
Hope to have some news up shortly.
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Not Breaking, and Not All That Newsy
A Ticketish source who has been reliable in the past reports that all hosts are under contract through at least the end of 2019. I don't think that's necessarily a new thing -- no recent re-ups, to my knowledge.
Just saying that, barring some personal misfortune, no lineup changes for the next year.
And now, for the hottest rumors on dramatic lineup changes for the Texas Legends . . . .
In expiation for this being a crappy post, extra reds today.
Sunday, October 28, 2018
MTC REPORTS -- Or, Thank You, Jason "Killer" Kellison
Awhile back Bob Sturm was flogging George DiGianni's 21 Day Makeover and Full Body Cleanse, which he said he would return to when he was feeling a little "doughy." "Doughy" and "cleanse" are not two words I care to associate with the Admirable Bob, but I must say that I had gotten to feeling a little doughy myself. I'm not a young chap any longer and it began to dawn on me that I couldn't continue to eat fast food and snacks and watch it burn off the next day. I'm tallish and carry weight pretty well, but when the scale got up to 223 . . . .
I didn't need to lose a ton -- 30, 35 pounds or so would be about right. I hadn't tried any commercial remedies except fen-phen, a way long time ago, before they took it off the market (worked great, coupla pills, the weight would come off mostly in the form of sweat and stress and a loss of appetite). Wait, I also tried Fit Foods, which gets people to lose weight by selling them food they really don't want to eat. Too much kale and quinoa. Sorry.
But I must say that Jason "Killer" Kellison's ads for SOTA Weight Loss sounded pretty interesting. I would think it would be tough to lose weight working in a show-bizzy atmosphere what with sponsor catering and grabbing food at odd hours and the like. And that result from a guy who apparently needed to lose a lot more than I did . . . .
So I gave it a try and I'm here to give you a report.
Here's how it works:
You go in and get weighed up. You talk to a counselor about how much weight you would ideally like to lose. More about the counselors below.
They estimate about how long it will take you to lose the weight on the program.
They give you all the food you will need on a week-to-week basis, with two exceptions to be noted. You get to pick the food from their "pantry": 7 "snacky" items, 21 "mealish" items, 28 total items for four eating events per day, up until evening dinner, for a week. You'll see this illustrated below. More about dinner in a moment.
They tell you what you may eat in substitution, and how often and in what amounts, if you must stray from the strict program. Eggs are usually a safe substitute, but there are others. Some you may substitute infrequently or in limited amounts.
They tell you when and how often to eat it. You are to eat a breakfast, a snack, lunch, an afternoon snack -- those are the four SOTA eating events -- and for dinner, a small serving, fist-sized, 6 ounces, of any meat of your choice -- they're not too specific on how it may be prepared, so I sneak in a couple of KFC thighs now and then -- and a couple of cups of vegetables, but not just any vegetables -- only the ones without sugar, like asparagus, broccoli, and cauliflower. (No peas, carrots, corn, the good stuff.) Those are the two exceptions, the evening meat (sometimes I have it for lunch instead) and some vegetables. They would also like you to have a couple of cups of vegetables for lunch, which I usually skip because it's a pain to prepare that stuff in an office.
They tell you what you may not eat -- fruits, lay off the wine and beer (modest spirits allowed, I'm a gin man myself), many other sweetie and salty carby things. Breads, potatoes, starchy things.
And a half-hour daily of light exercise -- nothing too strenuous, nothing to trigger too much hunger but enough to get your heart rate up once a day. A brisk walk will do, although I find that more exercise does not increase my hunger.
And then you go eat that and come back next week and weigh in and get coached up and fill your order for the next week's food. In the meantime, you must keep a diary of everything you eat and when and your exercise and water consumption for them to review when you come in for your up-coaching. They give you a form to use but I created my own Excel spreadsheet. Cheating should be recorded.
Now take a look at this: With the exception of the vegetables and meat that you supply THIS IS EVERYTHING YOU EAT FOR A WEEK up through the afternoon snack. I've laid out a typical seven-day regimen, the four SOTA "meals" you eat up until the evening meal.
With the exception of the bars and the chips -- note you may only eat one of one of those each day -- but including the stuff in the bottles, and I guess that cereal, ALL OF THAT IS POWDER. (Eat the cereal with half-and-half. Surprised? No carbs in half-and-half.) Low carbohydrate, high-protein, powder, to be mixed with water for your meal. You can eat any of them at any time -- that is, you don't have to have cereal for breakfast, and you don't have to have soup for lunch. You could reverse them if you want, or have a shake for breakfast or lunch or a snack. But not more than one chip or bar a day.
MEN AND WOMEN, IF THAT'S ALL YOU EAT UP TO YOUR EVENING MEAL, AND YOU DON'T CHEAT, YOUR BODY WILL HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO SHED FAT, AND A LOT OF IT, AND FAST.
And I did. I lost that 30 pounds. And I cheated a bit. I've done two stints. The first time I lost about 25-30, kept it off for a long time, but had a stretch of travel and vacations and other celebrations that put 5-7 back on, so I went back for a tuneup and took off another 10-15 or so. Just finishing it up, and I am back to how much I weighed about 20 years ago and still losing. Feel good, much more energy, and look a lot better. Man, I feel better just walking down the hall -- I can tell I'm not hauling nearly as much suet. I can tie my shoes without gasping for breath. I just went for a five-mile jog without working too hard when formerly I'd be stopping to catch my breath after a half-block.
Doesn't look like much food, does it? Will you get hungry? Possibly, but I didn't, really. The first couple of days may see you have a pang or two, but they will pass.
The ads are accurate. You will almost certainly lose more than 5 pounds the first week. The rate of loss is likely to slow after that, although if you're really religious and don't cheat, you should keep losing at a good clip. But if you lose two pounds a week, that's still double the rate you'll lose on most other programs.
The food, although not substantial, is generally palatable. The chips and bars are good. The chicken and beef bullion ditto. I did not care for the chili or some of the other soups. The pancake -- no, a terrible mess in the pan. It refused to cook; tried it a few times. The shakes (the bottles) are very good. Some of the mixtures are difficult to dissolve (the cream of chicken, which, when dissolved, is perfectly good, but watch for the bergs of undissolved powder). And at night, you can have your fish or chicken breast or meat patty or filet mignon or whatever youw ant and some vegetables (they encourage the use of butter on the vegs). For meat, I sometimes even use zero-carb weenies (Nathan's my favorite, zero carbohydrates) or sardines/smoked oysters (ditto). Eggs for dinner also a frequent choice.
How much does it cost? A lot. The more you want to lose, the longer you need to be on the program, and you have to pay it all up front -- an incentive to stay the course. It clocks in at about $225 a week, $30-$35 bucks a day. But remember -- they're giving you your food for most of your day. You really do spend less on groceries (no snacks, beer, other forbidden fruits.) They're coaching you up once a week. And after that's over, there's free counseling thereafter. And really -- how much do you want to lose weight, safely, without surgery? Being fat is really, really awful and it is hard to cure. Fat shaming is out, but hell, you know what people think about you if you're grossly unsightly fat? And you know what you think of yourself, and of other fatsos. And, hormonal problems aside, you're both right. You're just fat. SOTA gets it off quickly and safely, if not thrillingly. Its quick results at the outset have got to be one reason people are flocking to it -- there's little waiting to see the pounds start to come off.
(There's also a machine they want you to stand on that shakes up the system a bit, but if you think it looks silly they'll confide in you that it's mostly for older adults whose joints need a little persuading.)
Ah, the counseling. SOTA's secret weapon -- the Cute Chick Counselors. At my location, all of the counselors are young women, or very fit and attractive women of a certain age. You will probably see a different one each week. And when your day to weigh in rolls around, you become very aware of NOT WANTING TO DISAPPOINT THE CUTE CHICK COUNSELORS. Oh, no, you do not want them to see that you've cheated, because if you come in and you haven't lost anything and no cheating shows up on your food diary, they will know you are the worst kind of black liar and the Cute Chick Counselor will be oh, so disappointed. In general, they are as Killer and Ty and others have said -- very supportive, very encouraging, nice, full of tips and tricks and recipes you will ignore because you're a guy and you're not going to do recipes or use those awful, awful no-cal salad dressings they urge you to try to add flavor. Walden Farms, yeah, them's the ones. And the Stevia sugar substitute for your coffee -- both lethal. But you listen and nod your head because they're Cute Chick Counselors and you want them to approve of you.
The one problem I had with the program -- it's boring after a few weeks. After you've lost some weight, the temptation to cheat grows. Resist it if you can, but if you must, make it just a little. Next day you step on the scale, you've put on a pound. You're remorseful. You think about the Cute Chick Counselors. You resolve not to cheat. You fail, a little. But not enough, and the weight will start to come off again.
One thing I wonder about the man/woman on the street is: How does this work if you have a family eating regular meals? How does it work if you don't have a gig that allows you to visit SOTA during their (only) daytime hours? The weekly check-in is mandatory -- if you don't go, you don't get the next week's chow, and the weigh-in is essential to determine effectiveness.
Will it change the way you eat and live, like Killer says? If you go to the continued free coaching, like he says he does, and I think Ty has also taken advantage of, then probably. Me? I have not taken advantage of the free post-program counseling, but the SOTA program has been invaluable in reminding me that the Atkins Diet had it right all those years ago -- carbohydrates make you fat. Calories less important. Snacks and certain foods have lots of carbohyrdates. Find things to eat that don't have high carbs. Eat them, not the carb things. Eat less of them. You'll lose weight and keep it off. Exercise -- good for lots of things, but won't help you much with weight loss.
Being off SOTA has not stopped my craving for Chili-Cheese Fritos and the Taco Bell Combo #3 and Peanut M&Ms, but I'll tell you this -- when I was off the program, I stopped stuffing myself at every meal (felt lousy when I did), made SOTA-friendly choices at most turns, and stopped observing one of my rules, which was "When Food Is Free, You Must Eat as Much of It as Possible." The weight stayed off for a long time, until the aforementioned serial vacations to Hawaii, Chicago, and a Wyoming dude ranch, all within about six weeks, when I departed the wagon too many times.
Nope, best to just stick with the program, eat what they give you, keep cheating really low, pay attention to the permissible substitutes, don't go crazy with the evening meal, and dream about those Cute Chick Counselors.
So I have to thank Killer for his enthusiastic and persuasive endorsement. With a sidelong thanks to Ty and all those P1 telephone endorsers.
Speaking of Killer . . .
He's been doing those ads for a long time. They work. They work on SOTA's target demo -- overweight men approaching middle age who watch more sports than they play.
SOTA has obviously re-upped him as time has gone by.
I think our Killer must be doing pretty well. Thanks, man.
![]() |
| Sorry, Jinj, apples are not on the list. |
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Confessor James Muses on the Influence of Sports-Talk Radio on Strategery
I am always pleased to get submissions from Confessors suitable for running as a post. Frequent commenter James sent me this a couple of weeks ago. I regret I didn't get it up before now, because he obviously wrote it after a Cowboys loss, while we're all basking in the evanescent glow of a Cowboys win. Apologies, James
He makes a point you hear from time to time on The Ticket, so I thought it would be appropriate to run here.
Thank you, James. And enjoy the G-rated red you requested to accompany.
-- Plainsman
A few years ago, I heard the manager of a baseball team explain why he didn't bring his closer in with a 4-run lead: because it wasn't a save situation. In other words, he was letting a stat, not what's best for his team, influence a coaching decision.
If I'm allowed to switch sports, I'd like to share my theory that football coaches often have a tendency to let their coaching decisions be influenced, not by what's best for the team, but by fear of public opinion. Specifically, if a coach decides to punt on 4th-and-short, rather than basing that decision on any statistical probability of success, he's basing it on a fear of criticism. His thinking goes like this: if he goes for it on 4th and fails to get the 1st down, he'll get raked over the coals in the court of public opinion and on stations like The Ticket. But if he punts, and his team loses, then he isn't as likely to get criticism, because he did the conventional thing.
Obviously, this theory looks way off in light of the aftermath of the Cowboys' overtime loss the other night. Everyone's 2nd-guessing Garrett now. But historically, the fans, pundits and show hosts have acted differently than they did this week. In fact, I can remember a time or two when Wade Phillips took a lot of heat for going for it on 4th down.
Please note that this post is not intended to spark a lot of Garrett-bashing. That's low-hanging fruit. Nor is it an attempt to incite comments about last Sunday night's game. My theory is bigger than one game, or even one team. The question is simply this: do you agree that coaches who "play it safe" on 4th down are letting fear enter their thought process? Specifically, fear of being bashed by BAD Radio, the Musers, or local columnists? Follow-up question: Is there no longer a consensus about punting being the safe thing to do? Are we seeing a change?
Please note that this post is not intended to spark a lot of Garrett-bashing. That's low-hanging fruit. Nor is it an attempt to incite comments about last Sunday night's game. My theory is bigger than one game, or even one team. The question is simply this: do you agree that coaches who "play it safe" on 4th down are letting fear enter their thought process? Specifically, fear of being bashed by BAD Radio, the Musers, or local columnists? Follow-up question: Is there no longer a consensus about punting being the safe thing to do? Are we seeing a change?
Sunday, September 30, 2018
Endorsement and Encore
This is unlikely to be a controversial opinon.
I really like "Work in Progress" (although don't care for that name). I was out on a jog this morning listening to Justin Montemayor and David Mino and I chuckled out loud on more than one occasion, and was pretty attentive all the rest of the time.
Justin proved to be a natural broadcaster from his very earliest stints as a fill-in host and other on-air exposure. It has taken David a little longer to be comfortable, but he's improved immensely over the past several months.
There's also the matter of chemistry. I didn't feel it with Justin and Machine, but he and David work together pretty seamlessly and -- something even harder to achieve -- evenly. I thought of it as "Justin's show" for a long time, but now the balance is good and the back-and-forth pretty seamless.
Justin has always been funny, very much in the dry, witty mold of Craig "Junior" Miller. David doesn't have Justin's facility with the language, but he's got a native sense of what's going to play with the Sunday morning crowd.
And here's something else -- it's probably been in there somewhere and I just don't remember, but these guys steer blessedly clear of "current events." They'll do the weird news stories for laughs, but we don't get too many snide remarks about politicians of the left or right.
Thanks, gents.
I'd like to hear "Work in Progress" more often.
* * *
Friday, September 14, 2018
Just an Excuse for New Thread and New Redhead
If the apparent continuing decline of Dak Prescott is a material factor in the Cowboys' suckage, can we look back on the promotion of Kellen Moore to quarterbacks coach as the preposterous move it seemed at the time?
Ah, one might say, that's how Jason Garrett began his own dizzying ascent in the coaching ranks after his own undistinguished career as a Slinger of the Big Pigskin.
Yessss . . . . one might say that. And what might one's point be?
Tuesday, September 4, 2018
On the Road Again
Confessors,
I know I've been absent a bit, and that is going to continue. I'm about
to hit the road again tomorrow, so to get a fresh thread started I'll throw out
two half-assed sportsy opinions, which faithful readers will know are never
likely to become fully-assed.
(1) Jason Garrett's job will be saved through at least the 2019 season by Guillain–Barré syndrome.
(2) We're burying the lede here on Dez Bryant's failure to find a job to his liking. Pundit after host after sportswriter has said "There are teams out there that Dez Bryant could help. Wonder what's going on?"
And while most of them do acknowledge that he's a difficult handle, this aspect of his problem has been downplayed.
Men and women: He was a real problem.
We saw it on "Hard Knocks," where he seemed to not be with the program, a headache in team meetings.
And what about those sideline rants? It has been pointed out that audio proves that he was being rah-rah, being supportive, not being a bad guy.
Well lemme axes you a question, as Craig "Junior" Miller would say. Make it two questions:
(i) If you were a seasoned pro like many of the Cowboys were in Dez's heyday, would you like a manchild screaming at you like a high school sophomore to get up, get up, get up, come on, we can do it, etc. etc.?
(ii) And would you like it coming from the guy who sneers at game prep, never ever learned to run a crisp route, didn't even seem to learn plays for the longest time, increasingly dropped balls, whined about not getting enough balls thrown his way, and generally didn't seem to care all that much about winning until the Cowboys were losing on game day?
Nope, I don't think Dez Bryant was a good teammate at all, and I don't believe any Cowboy who says he was.
And I think the league knows it and can't get very excited about giving much money to a guy who demonstrated during his entire career that he didn't get it -- receiving records notwithstanding. When the headache overbalances the gift as the years go by, it's hard to find buyers for a hot potato.
Half-baked or half-assed.
(1) Jason Garrett's job will be saved through at least the 2019 season by Guillain–Barré syndrome.
(2) We're burying the lede here on Dez Bryant's failure to find a job to his liking. Pundit after host after sportswriter has said "There are teams out there that Dez Bryant could help. Wonder what's going on?"
And while most of them do acknowledge that he's a difficult handle, this aspect of his problem has been downplayed.
Men and women: He was a real problem.
We saw it on "Hard Knocks," where he seemed to not be with the program, a headache in team meetings.
And what about those sideline rants? It has been pointed out that audio proves that he was being rah-rah, being supportive, not being a bad guy.
Well lemme axes you a question, as Craig "Junior" Miller would say. Make it two questions:
(i) If you were a seasoned pro like many of the Cowboys were in Dez's heyday, would you like a manchild screaming at you like a high school sophomore to get up, get up, get up, come on, we can do it, etc. etc.?
(ii) And would you like it coming from the guy who sneers at game prep, never ever learned to run a crisp route, didn't even seem to learn plays for the longest time, increasingly dropped balls, whined about not getting enough balls thrown his way, and generally didn't seem to care all that much about winning until the Cowboys were losing on game day?
Nope, I don't think Dez Bryant was a good teammate at all, and I don't believe any Cowboy who says he was.
And I think the league knows it and can't get very excited about giving much money to a guy who demonstrated during his entire career that he didn't get it -- receiving records notwithstanding. When the headache overbalances the gift as the years go by, it's hard to find buyers for a hot potato.
Half-baked or half-assed.
Tuesday, August 28, 2018
I Concede Defeat [REDHEAD NSFW]
Not that I was ever going to win this battle.
Long-time Confessors are aware that I don't like Fight Night. You can search for past articles where I go into detail, but to summarize:
(1) There's enough violence in the world between strangers without The Ticket promoting it.
(2) Although it hasn't happened to date, some terrible things can happen when amateurs start hitting each other -- rather, start getting hit. Sometimes hard. A death or very serious injury in the ring, while unlikely, is by no means impossible. A tragedy for the victim, and a tragedy for The Ticket.
And by the way -- Laurence Cole is not universally admired as a referee, as proud as The Ticket seems to be of having secured his services. Laurence Cole is an Idiot; The Laurence Cole Awards
(3) It's not a great broadcast. Multiple voices talking at once, each of them hollering "OHHhhhh" when someone gets hit. Blow-by-blow guy providing inexpert narration (Norm's the best). Pathetic post-fight interviews (Jake's oration following his definitive reduction of Mike from Palookaville a notable exception).
So my objections are part weenielike, and part aesthetic.
The only good thing about it is getting to hear the magnificent Rich Phillips announcing.
But it's here to stay, at least until my Cassandra-like warnings come true.
I do tune in some years, kind of like not turning away from a train wreck. But might be tuning into the Cowboys game.
Redhead potentially NSFW, so you'll have to scroll down . . .
Thursday, August 23, 2018
I Like It When Julie Dobbs Says the Score Is "Nine to Zero" or "Six to Zero"
As I heard her do with some recent Ranger scores.
It's not what I'd call a profound topic, but wanted to get something new up to see if we couldn't get some innarestin new thread started.
Not Julie:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























